<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>iTech Zines &#187; google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itechzines.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itechzines.com</link>
	<description>IT and Tech Magazines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 22:59:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1715</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Best Free Image Hosting</title>
		<link>http://www.itechzines.com/best-free-image-hosting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.itechzines.com/best-free-image-hosting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 22:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Picasa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itechzines.com/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the best free image hosting on internet? Well there are many free hosting for your image out there like tinypic, photobucket, imageshack etc. But all those service are good for less bandwidth usage. When your bandwidth need is over, your image will be inaccessible. It&#8217;s bad for blogger who save their blog image [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the <strong>best free image hosting</strong> on internet? Well there are many free hosting for your image out there like tinypic, photobucket, imageshack etc. But all those service are good for less bandwidth usage. When your bandwidth need is over, your image will be inaccessible. It&#8217;s bad for blogger who save their blog image in different place than in their blog.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/_GrZFezD6vZU/SLKJuY49WZI/AAAAAAAAA18/Rvtmc4I-s_4/picasalogo.jpg" alt="Picasa Image hosting" width="350" height="122" /></p>
<p><span id="more-37"></span></p>
<p>After search and trial, finally I&#8217;ve found that the best free image storage with large bandwidth that is <strong><a href="http://picasa.google.com/">Picasa</a></strong> from Google. The have large space (the maximum Storage Space is 1GB while, maximum file size is 20MB, maximum mega-pixels is 50MP) and I think they give (almost) unlimited bandwidth. For more space you can sign up for another Google account or you can upgrade your account. If you know better <strong>free image hosting</strong> than Picasa, just share your though in comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.itechzines.com/best-free-image-hosting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft &amp; Yahoo! Vs Google</title>
		<link>http://www.itechzines.com/microsoft-yahoo-vs-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.itechzines.com/microsoft-yahoo-vs-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 05:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itechzines.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big company Microsoft and Yahoo! has finally joined to &#8216;fight&#8217; againts Google after all rumor about Microsoft taking over Yahoo! which last year.
SUNNYVALE, Calif. and REDMOND, Wash. – 29 July, 2009 – Yahoo! and Microsoft announced an agreement that will improve the Web search experience for users and advertisers, and deliver sustained innovation to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big company <strong>Microsoft and Yahoo!</strong> has finally joined to &#8216;fight&#8217; againts Google after all rumor about <strong>Microsoft taking over Yahoo!</strong> which last year.</p>
<blockquote><p>SUNNYVALE, Calif. and REDMOND, Wash. – 29 July, 2009 – Yahoo! and Microsoft announced an agreement that will improve the Web search experience for users and advertisers, and deliver sustained innovation to the industry. In simple terms, Microsoft will now power Yahoo! search while Yahoo! will become the exclusive worldwide relationship sales force for both companies’ premium search advertisers.</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-20"></span><br />
<strong>Here are the agreement between Microsoft and Yahoo!</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> The term of the agreement is 10 years;</li>
<li> Microsoft will acquire an exclusive 10 year license to Yahoo!’s core search technologies, and Microsoft will have the ability to integrate Yahoo! search technologies into its existing web search platforms;</li>
<li> Microsoft’s Bing will be the exclusive algorithmic search and paid search platform for Yahoo! sites. Yahoo! will continue to use its technology and data in other areas of its business such as enhancing display advertising technology.</li>
<li> Yahoo! will become the exclusive worldwide relationship sales force for both companies’ premium search advertisers. Self-serve advertising for both companies will be fulfilled by Microsoft’s AdCenter platform, and prices for all search ads will continue to be set by AdCenter’s automated auction process.</li>
<li> Each company will maintain its own separate display advertising business and sales force.</li>
<li> Yahoo! will innovate and “own” the user experience on Yahoo! properties, including the user experience for search, even though it will be powered by Microsoft technology.</li>
<li> Microsoft will compensate Yahoo! through a revenue sharing agreement on traffic generated on Yahoo!’s network of both owned and operated (O&amp;O) and affiliate sites.</li>
<li> Microsoft will pay traffic acquisition costs (TAC) to Yahoo! at an initial rate of 88% of search revenue generated on Yahoo!’s O&amp;O sites during the first 5 years of the agreement.</li>
<li> Yahoo! will continue to syndicate its existing search affiliate partnerships.</li>
<li> Microsoft will guarantee Yahoo!’s O&amp;O revenue per search (RPS) in each country for the first 18 months following initial implementation in that country.</li>
<li> At full implementation (expected to occur within 24 months following regulatory approval), Yahoo! estimates, based on current levels of revenue and current operating expenses, that this agreement will provide a benefit to annual GAAP operating income of approximately $500 million and capital expenditure savings of approximately $200 million. Yahoo! also estimates that this agreement will provide a benefit to annual operating cash flow of approximately $275 million.</li>
<li> The agreement protects consumer privacy by limiting the data shared between the companies to the minimum necessary to operate and improve the combined search platform, and restricts the use of search data shared between the companies. The agreement maintains the industry-leading privacy practices that each company follows today.<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2009/jul09/07-29release.mspx">source</a></li>
</ul>
<p><em>Can they beat google as king of internet? let&#8217;s see &#8230;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.itechzines.com/microsoft-yahoo-vs-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

